Today Dr. Bolger gave an interesting lecture on “church growth” and approached the concept positively by reviewing how McGavern thought about it. Essentially, in India, McGavern noticed how churches didn’t grow when potential converts were asked to jump social boundaries and adopt a new culture. So McGavern thought about how the gospel might become inculturated in a specific context, and how its expression could authentically reflect a particular culture while also stay true to itself. The gospel expressed in this way was his vision for a “People Movement.” Lots of good questions were raised about this kind of vision for missions and the church. Dr. Bolger talked about the specifically modern/western development of a secular sphere and how this concept is foreign to many cultures and, thus, should be seen critically. And yet the secular sphere, and the individualism that it implies–which we rightly criticize–is a direct outgrowth of a Lutheran hermenutic and of the great American invention, the separation of church and state. Granted much more (probably such insidious things as materialism and consumerism) than Luther and the freedom of religion go into making us who we are today, but before we go and denounce individualism altogether (and modernism, which gave rise to the concept) we should remember that the concept helped put an end to all the wars and persecutions that ravished a Christian Europe. No doubt, it also had something to do with what Jesus said, but for some reason there seems to be something cyclical about how the church ignores or obscures what he had to say about killing each other.
March 1, 2007 at 4:21 am
2nd rough draft…
Aline, looks like you are off to a solid start here. I think your intro needs to be tightened up and accented with a solid thesis statement which encompasses what you intend to dhow, how you intend to show it, and why you think it’s important, but past that it looks like you have some great material and direction with regard to contextual fators and how your kingdom vision bridges the gap. you’re on a good track.
March 15, 2007 at 7:53 pm
Dear Aline,
Ever since I accidently ran across your blog, I have been a huge fan. Although I get a little glimpse of what you are responding to, your comments are engaging nonetheless. I tend to agree with you. Even though there are definite problems with individualism, and there are extremities of securalism that are harmful, I think the seperation of church and state is something to be aspired to. Most, if not all, of the historical examples of a marraige of church and state has been disasterous. The reformation was a bloody mess exactly because of this marraige of church and state. The examples we have today, Islam and politics so tied together, shows another aspect of such a marraige. Whenever we make faith an obligation and enforce it by the state, a tyranny that God did not intend takes place.